South Africa: Documented migrants are also fleeing SA, unable to access care and treatment

Doctors Without Borders (MSF) has raised concern about the growing number of documented foreigners fleeing South Africa, saying the “self- repatriation” process cannot always be described as voluntary.

The humanitarian organisation says many Malawians, Mozambicans and Zimbabweans with valid documentation have been left with little choice but to return to their home countries after facing intimidation, violence and threats linked to anti-illegal migrant sentiment in parts of South Africa.

“The narrative that the so-called ’self-repatriation’ process is always voluntary is questionable, as many fearful Malawians, Mozambicans and Zimbabweans insist that they are documented but have little choice other than to flee for their safety,” the humanitarian organisation said.

MSF has expressed concern about interruptions in health care among people living with HIV, TB, diabetes, hypertension and mental health conditions, as defaulting on treatment can have serious and, in some cases, life-threatening consequences.

The government established a Temporary Repatriation Processing Centre (TRPC) in Musina on July 1 after consolidating operations from several sites around the country. The interministerial committee on migration said they have seen a tremendous increase in the number of foreigners who have been deported or repatriated.

Its medical tent is located some distance from where people queue daily to board buses back to their home countries, making it difficult for health care workers to reach those in need of medical assistance.

MSF said while the system appears efficient, it warned that vulnerable people may be missed because they are reluctant to leave queues to seek medical care or because they move on before receiving assistance.

Further, the organisation said many migrants continue travelling through informal routes.

“More than 100,000 people fleeing or being displaced are the sort of numbers MSF sees in hot conflict areas, not relatively stable democracies such as South Africa,” said MSF emergency medical team member Caroline Masunda in Musina. “With so many displaced people, we call on governments in the region to step up collaborative efforts to ensure continuity of care for patients.”

MSF counsellors across the border in Beitbridge are concerned about the trauma their patients are experiencing.

*Nobuhle, who had been living in Soweto, Johannesburg, and working as a chef, was devastated to return home from work on July 17 to find her house had been burnt down. Her three children were away at the time.

“I lost my passport and permit, all my clothes and furniture, my children’s birth records and birth certificates. I have nothing with me. All I have is this small handbag. I do not even have a change of clothes,” she said.

Nobuhle said she has lost hope.

“I thought having a passport and permit would save me, but no, I was wrong. I wanted to kill myself. I have lost hope, and I do not know what I will do,” she said.

Passing through Musina, *Joseph, a 49-year-old Malawian from Pietermaritzburg who has been working as a tailor in South Africa since 1995, had to leave his antiretroviral (ARV) medication as he fled his home.

He said people came to his house telling him to go.
“I ran away and went to hide with my friends. Then I went to Durban. I [was] staying there at the bus station; it was raining, but we were outside. I left my [HIV] medication there in the house. I don’t worry about that or the clothes; if I am still alive, I can get it. I haven’t taken the medication in a few weeks. It is a relief; I got my medication from MSF,” he said.

*Freedom Moyo, a 46-year-old Zimbabwean, moved to South Africa in 2009, where he has been working as an electrician and plumber.

Treated at Beitbridge, he said he was forced to leave South Africa after his health deteriorated because he had been unable to access his ARV medication.

“I defaulted on my medication for three months because of the xenophobic attacks in South Africa. I could no longer access the clinic as I used to, and my condition worsened. Before all this, the nurses in South Africa would not take it lightly if we missed the day for collection of our ARVs. Now everything has changed; they no longer want us.”

He said he had to be admitted to hospital in Zimbabwe.

“When I arrived on the Zimbabwean side, I was admitted for four days because I had lost a lot of weight, my leg was swollen, and I was feeling very weak. I am happy because I received a one-month supply of ARVs and was referred to a local clinic in Gweru for continued treatment.”

MSF said their teams are also treating many patients who do not have access to their chronic hypertension medication.

The organisation noted that, left untreated, high blood pressure can lead to serious complications, including strokes, heart failure, blood clots and even death.

*Joyce, a Malawian from Boksburg North near Johannesburg, was also treated by the MSF team in Musina.

Joyce said her blood pressure reading was 214/95, and she was not going to the clinic, as she was afraid.

When she fled her home, Joyce travelled to Musina after sleeping outside for two days.

“We are seeing a trend in Musina of patients who have been unable to access life-saving HIV and TB treatment for months after being turned away from South African health care facilities because they are migrants, increasing their risk of treatment failure and, in some cases, developing drug resistance,” Masunda said.

MSF cited the example of *Munyaradzi, who was exposed to a toxic chemical while working in a Zimbabwean gold mine six years ago and still struggles with debilitating pain.

He had not had access to his chronic pain medication for seven weeks while he travelled from Dennilton, a rural town straddling the Limpopo-Mpumalanga border, to the repatriation centre.

“That chemical affected me in 2020, and I started taking tablets from that year until now. I know they don’t like us here in South Africa, so I got my mind to go back home, but the police caught me before I went. They took me to the police station. I told them about my situation, that I am taking tablets. They didn’t take me to a clinic until now,” he told MSF. “My body has got so much pain.”

HIV Justice Network at AIDS 2026: new research, practical tools and global advocacy for HIV justice

The HIV Justice Network (HJN) team will be participating in the 26th International AIDS Conference (AIDS 2026) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, where we will showcase new research, launch an important new global resource, facilitate community dialogue, and connect with partners from around the world.

Throughout the conference, visit us in the Global Village to explore our work, meet the team, and discover practical tools supporting HIV justice.

Visit the HIV Justice Network booth

Global Village | Monday 27 – Thursday 30 July

Our interactive booth will feature:

  • the Global HIV Criminalisation Database
  • the HIV Justice Academy
  • Positive Destinations, our platform addressing HIV-related travel and migration restrictions
  • practical tools and resources to support advocacy, legal reform and community action against HIV criminalisation

Meet members of the HIV Justice Network team, learn about our latest projects, and discover how you can contribute to global efforts to end HIV criminalisation and HIV-related travel restrictions.

Whether you are an activist, researcher, lawyer, healthcare provider, policymaker or funder, we would love to meet you and discuss opportunities for collaboration.

Launching the Guidance on Good Practices in HIV Decriminalisation

Thursday 30 July | 10:45–11:45 | Global Village

One of the highlights of our week will be the official launch of the Guidance on Good Practices in HIV Decriminalisation, developed by HJN on behalf of HIV JUSTICE WORLDWIDE and the Global Partnership for Action to Eliminate All Forms of HIV-Related Stigma and Discrimination, with support from UNAIDS.

This practical session will introduce advocacy resources, legal literacy tools and community-led strategies that can help challenge HIV criminalisation around the world.

Speakers include Edwin Bernard, Janet Butler McPhee, Isis Tapia, Svitlana Moroz, Sofía Várguez and Immaculate Owomugisha Bazare.

HJN represented in AIDS 2026 plenary

Thursday 30 July | Morning plenary

HIV Justice Network is also proud to see Immaculate Owomugisha Bazare, a member of our Supervisory Board and Executive Director of the Centre for Women Justice Uganda, featured in one of AIDS 2026’s flagship plenary sessions.

Immaculate will speak on “Justice, rights and HIV: Building resilient legal frameworks”, bringing her expertise as a lawyer, advocate and leader in advancing HIV justice and gender equality. Her participation highlights the growing recognition that ending HIV criminalisation and other punitive laws is essential to an effective, rights-based HIV response.

Breastfeeding is not a crime!

Wednesday 29 July | 16:30–18:00 | Global Village

HJN’s Alison Symington will lead an interactive workshop, in partnership with ICW Global, exploring criminalisation and other punitive responses to women living with HIV who breastfeed.

The workshop will bring together advocates, researchers and clinicians to contribute to a growing global consensus supporting rights-based, evidence-informed approaches grounded in bodily autonomy and informed choice.

Presenting new research

HJN team members will present four abstracts during AIDS 2026.

Oral presentation

Thursday 30 July | 16:30–17:30 | Room 203

Edwin Bernard
HIV criminalisation as structural violence: science, geopolitics and community-led pathways to justice

Drawing on new global data, this presentation argues that HIV criminalisation persists because of structural violence embedded within legal, political and funding systems. It explores how community-led advocacy is helping to close the gap between science and the law.

Poster presentations

Wednesday 29 July | 12:15–13:15

  • Sylvie Beaumont – From the doctor’s office to the jail cell: system reforms to protect care, confidentiality and prevention in the context of HIV criminalisation.
  • Edwin Bernard – Science, rights, and HIV on trial: is rising HIV criminalisation part of a global anti-science/anti-rights resurgence?

Thursday 30 July | 12:00–13:00

  • Sofía Várguez – Positive destinations or persistent barriers? Rethinking HIV-related travel restrictions.

Sofía’s poster has been selected for the Track F Featured Poster Walk, where invited presenters will give short presentations and discuss their work with conference delegates.

Follow us from Rio

We’ll be sharing highlights, photos, videos and key messages throughout the conference across our website and social media channels.

Whether you’re attending AIDS 2026 in person or following from elsewhere, we hope you’ll join us as we continue working towards a world where HIV criminalisation is consigned to history.

Zimbabwe: Virtual health platform helps to prevent treatment interruption among returning migrants

Digital tools help Zimbabwe’s HIV migrants stay in care

As droves of Zimbabweans return home from South Africa in a wave of deportations and anti-immigrant sentiment, health experts warn that disruptions to HIV treatment could leave many at risk unless returnees are quickly reconnected to care.

The South African government says more than 53,000 foreign nationals have been processed for deportation or repatriation as part of a crackdown on “irregular migration” following weeks of violent anti-immigration protests. Most of the returnees are from Malawi, Zimbabwe and Mozambique.

According to Statistics South Africa, Zimbabweans constitute one of the country’s largest migrant communities, with an estimated one million living there.

“We know that displacement, whether planned or sudden, can disrupt treatment, resulting in missed medication, poor health outcomes and increased risk of opportunistic infections.”

Tatenda C. Makoni, executive director, ZNNP+

Research in South Africa’s Gauteng province, which carries the country’s largest HIV burden, found HIV prevalence among international migrants to be around 10 per cent.

For many migrants living with HIV, sudden displacement presents immediate risks. Medication may be left behind, treatment records lost, and patients may struggle to navigate health systems on their return.

“The disruption is not just about the medicines,” Efison Dhodho, research coordinator at Zimbabwe’s Biomedical Research and Training Institute, told SciDev.Net.

“Many returnees may have lost their treatment records, some fear accidental disclosure of their HIV status when they return to their communities, while others are dealing with the psychological stress of suddenly losing their livelihoods.”

Health authorities in Zimbabwe, which has one of Southern Africa’s largest HIV treatment programmes, say they are responding through a combination of digital health and patient-centred care models designed to prevent treatment interruptions among mobile populations.

Owen Mugurungi, director of the AIDS and TB unit in Zimbabwe’s Ministry of Health and Child Care, said the ministry was working with the Zimbabwe National Network of People Living with HIV (ZNNP+) and others to make sure everyone who needs antiretroviral drugs can accesses them.

The Zimbabwe National AIDS Council (NAC) urged returning migrants with HIV to enrol immediately into Zimbabwe’s HIV treatment programme upon arrival.

“What I know, and what I want to encourage, is for people living with HIV who are returning, when they get to their respective homes, to go to the nearest health facility and be absorbed into the very robust HIV treatment programme which we have in Zimbabwe,” said NAC chief executive officer Bernard Madzima.

“We have capable health workers at every facility in the country, from clinic level up to the highest referral hospitals, so there should be no problem in terms of them being integrated into this system.”

‘Omalayitsha’ network

Madzima noted that many Zimbabweans working in South Africa had been accessing six-month supplies of antiretroviral medicines from Zimbabwe through an informal cross-border transporter network known as “omalayitsha”, allowing them to remain on treatment while living abroad.

However, he said more people are now returning permanently and need to be fully integrated into local HIV services.

Mental health challenges, stigma and the practical realities of displacement can all affect adherence to treatment, said Dhodho, who has worked on Zimbabwe’s HIV care strategies for migrant populations.

“If your life is suddenly disrupted and you’re forced to leave, your medicines may be left behind,” he explained.

“Even a short disruption in routine can affect adherence. HIV treatment works best when people maintain viral suppression, which protects both their own health and helps prevent onward transmission.”

Dhodho said the country had already developed approaches, including the omalayitsha model, which could help returning migrants reintegrate into care more effectively.

However, he added that omalayitsha depends on predictable travel patterns and stable living arrangements, both of which have been disrupted by the recent wave of deportations.

Telehealth solutions

To bridge that gap, ZNNP+ has expanded the use of Kutabila, a virtual health platform that links returning migrants with HIV treatment and care services.

“The recent increase in the number of Zimbabweans returning home from South Africa, coupled with reports of deportations and heightened anti-foreigner sentiment, raised concerns about the continuity of HIV treatment among people living with HIV,” said Tatenda C. Makoni, executive director of ZNNP+.

“We know that displacement, whether planned or sudden, can disrupt treatment, resulting in missed medication, poor health outcomes and increased risk of opportunistic infections.”

Through telephone-based counselling and referral services, trained counsellors assess callers’ treatment needs, direct them to the nearest health facility and provide adherence counselling and psychosocial support.

Between 1 June and 8 July, the platform received more than 300 calls from returning migrants, according to Makoni. He said most were seeking help on restarting treatment, replacing lost medical records, transferring HIV care from South Africa or accessing medicines after treatment interruptions.

Since its launch, Kutabila has handled more than 10,500 client interactions and successfully linked over 7,300 people living with HIV to treatment and care services, he added.

Empathy approach

Zimbabwe is also applying lessons from Uzwelo, meaning empathy, a person-centred approach developed after the COVID-19 pandemic to re-engage people who had interrupted HIV treatment.

Rather than focusing only on tracing people who miss clinic appointments, Uzwelo encourages healthcare workers to understand the individual circumstances that caused treatment interruption and develop care plans tailored to each patient’s situation.

According to Dhodho, who helped develop the approach, Uzwelo helped recover nearly a quarter of patients who had fallen out of care within just three months after being introduced in pilot districts.

“The health worker meets the client with empathy instead of judgement,” he explained.

“The question becomes, ‘How do we make treatment work for your circumstances?’ rather than ‘Why did you default?’”

Makoni believes such innovations offer lessons that extend beyond Zimbabwe.

“Migration is a regional issue, and ensuring continuity of HIV treatment requires regional solutions,” he said.

“Continuity of HIV treatment should not stop at national borders.”

This piece was produced by SciDev.Net’s Sub-Saharan Africa English desk.

Philippines: New agreement seeks to remove healthcare barriers for overseas Filipino workers

The Department of Health (DOH) and the Department of Migrant Workers signed a Memorandum of Understanding for better healthcare access for overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) and their families during the 2026 Migrant Workers’ Health Summit in Quezon City on Tuesday.

“This reflects our shared commitment to improve coordination, strengthen our service delivery, and ensure that the health and well-being of Filipino migrant workers remain a national priority,” Health Secretary Ted Herbosa said during the summit.

“Migration creates opportunities for millions of Filipinos, but it also presents unique health challenges, including occupational risks, communicable diseases, mental health concerns, and barriers to accessing health services,” Herbosa added.

Migrant Workers Secretary Hans Leo Cacdac said OFWs deserve support not only when they are earning and sending money, but more so when they need help.

Herbosa noted that the DOH’s telemedicine services were meant to support the mental health of migrant workers.

“So our psychiatrists from the National Center for Mental Health provide online psychosocial support,” said Herbosa.

The two-day summit provides free medical services for migrant workers, including screening for hypertension, diabetes, cancer, tuberculosis, and HIV, as well as nutrition assessments.

Filipino tourists heading to Oman no longer need to present a negative HIV medical certificate

Oman drops HIV test requirement for Filipino visa-free travelers after Manila’s diplomatic push

Filipino tourists heading to Oman under the country’s 14-day visa-free arrangement no longer need to present a negative HIV medical certificate before boarding their flights, the Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs announced Monday, closing a two-month diplomatic row that disrupted travel and drew widespread condemnation.

The Omani government’s decision to waive the requirement marks a significant turnaround from a policy that had quietly taken effect on 1 March 2026, with no formal public announcement from either Muscat or the carriers enforcing it at check-in counters. The rule first came to broad attention through traveler accounts shared on community pages serving Filipinos in Oman — accounts that The Global Filipino Magazine was among the first to report on in the weeks that followed.

The controversy deepened when Oman Air’s own website displayed the policy under a prominent homepage banner titled “New Travel Requirement for Philippine Nationals Traveling to Oman,” with a linked circular informing trade partners that a pre-arrival HIV test bearing a QR code from an accredited clinic was mandatory for all adult Filipino nationals, “regardless of their country of departure” — a scope that went beyond visa-free tourists to include Filipinos living and working across GCC countries.

That circular stood in tension with the position offered by the Omani Embassy in Manila when the DFA formally intervened on April 17. The embassy told Philippine officials that the HIV certificate requirement applied exclusively to tourists using the visa-free entry program — not to Filipinos holding valid Omani work visas. “The HIV certificate applies only to tourists availing of the visa-free entry to Oman, and not to those who were issued work visas,” the DFA said, relaying the embassy’s clarification.

At the time, the DFA said it had made “strong representations” with the Omani Embassy seeking the removal of the policy. “The Department of Foreign Affairs has made strong representations with the Oman Embassy in Manila for the removal of the negative HIV medical certificate requirement for all Filipino travellers to Oman,” the department said in a statement. It added that the embassy had confirmed the matter was being reviewed at the government level, with talks scheduled to deliberate on revisions.

The Philippines and Oman have maintained diplomatic ties since 1980, with labor mobility at the core of the relationship. An estimated 45,000 to over 50,000 Filipinos live and work in the Gulf state across sectors including healthcare, hospitality, engineering, and domestic work. Oman had only recently expanded bilateral goodwill by extending visa-free entry to Filipino nationals — a policy that made the HIV testing requirement, applied uniquely to Filipinos, all the more jarring to critics who viewed it as discriminatory.

The DFA expressed appreciation to Muscat for the policy reversal, describing it as a reflection of the strong ties between the two nations. Travelers have been advised to continue complying with all other entry requirements set by Omani authorities.

National Health Insurance Act could deny refugees, asylum seekers and undocumented migrants HIV treatment

South Africa’s NHI Act Risks Fueling Anti-Immigrant Sentiment by Restricting HIV Treatment

Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi defends the controversial Section 33, drawing criticism that the policy could deny life-saving care to asylum seekers and undocumented migrants.

As violent xenophobic protests demanding the mass expulsion of foreign nationals sweep across South Africa, a highly contentious legislative battle regarding the National Health Insurance (NHI) Act is threatening to compound the crisis. Public health advocates are sounding the alarm over specific clauses embedded within the sweeping healthcare reform that could legally strip refugees, asylum seekers, and undocumented migrants of access to life-saving HIV treatments.

The controversy places Health Minister Dr. Aaron Motsoaledi at the center of a profound ethical and epidemiological dilemma. While the administration champions the NHI as the ultimate equalizer for South Africa’s deeply fractured healthcare system, the deliberate exclusion of vulnerable migrant populations risks triggering a devastating public health catastrophe. The resulting policy friction threatens to not only derail the nation’s world-leading antiretroviral program but also validate the very anti-immigrant rhetoric currently destabilizing the nation.

What Exactly Does Section 33 Entail?

The architectural core of the controversy lies within Section 33 of the NHI Act. The legislation mandates the effective abolition of private medical aids in their current form, relegating them to merely providing top-up coverage for services not subsidized by the state fund. The economic logic is clear: re-route the massive capital currently spent by the wealthy on private medical schemes (representing 15% of the population) into a centralized, universal pool to serve the remaining 85%.

However, the eligibility criteria for this universal pool are rigidly nationalistic. The state’s Health Patient Registration System (HPRS) is designed to integrate strictly with Department of Home Affairs databases. South African citizens, documented permanent residents, and formally recognized refugees will be integrated. Conversely, undocumented migrants and asylum seekers trapped in South Africa’s notoriously backlogged immigration system will be categorically excluded from comprehensive coverage.

Critics point to a damning Treasury letter from acting Director-General Ismail Momoniat, which warned that the legislation is aggressively “unfriendly” to asylum seekers, noting that “even children [are] not entitled to hospital care unless in an emergency.”

How Will This Affect Asylum Seekers and Refugees?

The immediate casualty of this legislative exclusion is infectious disease management, primarily HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis. South Africa currently operates the largest antiretroviral therapy (ART) program in the world, a colossal effort requiring unbroken adherence to prevent viral mutation and community transmission.

If the NHI Act proceeds unaltered, undocumented migrants and pending asylum seekers who currently rely on state clinics for their daily ART regimens will be severed from the supply chain. Public health experts at the Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA) warn that denying treatment based on citizenship status will inevitably lead to massive spikes in viral loads among migrant communities. This policy approach essentially weaponizes the healthcare system, transforming clinics into immigration checkpoints.

Minister Motsoaledi has publicly acknowledged this epidemiological paradox, admitting in interviews that denying infectious disease care to any demographic “works in reverse” regarding national health security. A virus does not recognize border control or passport stamps; unchecked transmission within migrant communities will inevitably spill over into the broader South African populace.

Why Is the Health Minister Standing Firm?

Despite the dire warnings regarding both the collapse of private medical aids and the exclusion of migrants, Dr. Motsoaledi remains unyielding on the foundational architecture of the NHI. In a recent broadcast interview, he declared that Section 33 will not be scrapped, even if it triggers the collapse of the fragile Government of National Unity (GNU).

“You can’t come and tell me ‘I support this universal coverage, but Section 33 must go.’ It’s like supporting a house, but the foundation must go. Don’t you know it’s going to collapse?” Motsoaledi stated. He maintains that preserving the private medical aid sector would perpetuate the apartheid-era inequalities that the NHI was explicitly designed to eradicate.

However, regarding the specific exclusion of migrants, the Minister has signaled a slight pragmatic retreat. He indicated a willingness to adapt regulatory frameworks to ensure that vital interventions—such as HIV treatment, maternal care, and emergency disease surveillance—remain accessible to all populations, regardless of documentation. Yet, without formal amendments to the Act itself, these assurances remain dangerously reliant on ministerial discretion rather than entrenched legal rights.

Are There Parallels in East Africa’s Universal Health Rollouts?

The tension between national healthcare funding and immigrant access is a challenge actively playing out across the continent. In Kenya, the ongoing transition from the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) to the Social Health Insurance Fund (SHIF) has sparked similar debates regarding the integration of East African Community (EAC) citizens and the massive refugee populations residing in Dadaab and Kakuma camps.

Unlike South Africa, Kenya’s public health framework heavily relies on international donor partnerships—specifically the UNHCR and global health NGOs—to parallel-fund migrant healthcare, preventing the state treasury from absorbing the entire fiscal burden. Similarly, the United Kingdom’s NHS imposes an immigration health surcharge on visa applicants, creating a financial gateway rather than an outright prohibition on care.

For Pretoria, the path forward is fraught with legal peril. As civil rights organizations prepare constitutional challenges against the NHI Act, the Constitutional Court will ultimately determine if the right to life and basic healthcare supersedes the boundaries of citizenship. Until then, millions of undocumented individuals remain trapped between violent vigilantes on the streets and a healthcare system preparing to close its doors.

Philippine: New plan aims to give HIV-positive Filipino workers abroad easier access to care

Filipino migrant workers living with HIV stand to gain clearer pathways to care and firmer protections under a policy framework that government and international partners began shaping at a roundtable in Manila this week.

The discussion took place on June 15, 2026, at the Department of Migrant Workers (DMW) Central Office. Convened by the DMW together with the Philippine National AIDS Council (PNAC), the gathering drew in other government bodies, civil society groups, and the International Organization for Migration (IOM). Their shared task was to map out how the state can better serve overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) who are coping with HIV while abroad.

At the heart of the talks were the persistent gaps in HIV programs that leave migrant workers without dependable support once they leave the country. The proposed framework is meant to address those weak points, giving affected workers more responsive treatment and a defined route to assistance at every stage of their time overseas. Participants laid out specific policy directions and recommendations geared toward letting workers seek help without shame or hesitation.

A recurring theme during the roundtable was accountability across agencies. Those present argued that without stronger coordination between the offices responsible for migrant welfare, workers living with HIV will continue to struggle to reach the services they are entitled to. The aim, stakeholders said, is to surround these workers with a community of care while safeguarding their rights and overall welfare.

The Philippine response to HIV and AIDS is anchored in Republic Act 11166, the law that reconstituted PNAC and tasked it with steering the country’s prevention and treatment efforts. The council operates as the central planning and policy body on HIV, drawing its membership from national agencies, civil society, and the community of people living with HIV.

For the DMW, the initiative fits within a broader push to ensure that policies serving OFWs account for their health and dignity, not only their employment. The framework discussed this week signals that workers managing a chronic condition far from home remain part of that mandate.

India: Inside India’s highest-migration corridor, HIV treatment follows an uncertain path

For Migrant Workers With HIV, Staying on Treatment Takes More Than Just Medicine

A ground report from the Ganjam-Surat corridor, where migrants with HIV navigate long shifts, travel, and stigma.

When he travelled from Surat back to his village in Odisha’s Ganjam district five years ago for some work, he carried a month’s stock of his daily HIV medicines. But the visit stretched longer than expected. The medicines ran out.

At the time, he did not think much of it. But when he returned to Surat three months later, where he worked in the textile industry, filling and replacing thread bobbins for weaving machines, his body began weakening again.

The work was difficult even otherwise: 12-hour daily shifts inside a room with barely any fans or ventilations, just heat and the constant roar of machines. With a weakened immunity, he couldn’t keep up. Soon, he got jaundice too. It’s not like medicines weren’t available in Odisha. But the hospital was around 80 kilometres away from his house, and Jyotesh had not carried his transfer papers.

“We’re all going to Ganjam for a wedding next week. This time, I have carried medicines worth two months,” he says in late April this year, placing the medicine bottle on the orange-and-blue chattai in his rented house in Surat. Next to it lies a stack of green medical documents carrying his treatment history since his diagnosis. One of the corners has been chewed through—”a rat bit it”, he says with a smile. 

The 41-year-old discovered he and his wife were HIV positive in 2010, when she was pregnant with her first child. By then, he had already spent two decades moving between Ganjam and Surat. His three children don’t have HIV but their lives are still shaped by it: Jyotesh and his wife make sure they don’t eat on the same plate as their kids or share food, and are careful around cuts and wounds. “I know it doesn’t spread that way,” he says. “But in my head, I just want to be careful.”

India’s HIV programme provides free antiretroviral therapy (ART) through government-run ART centres across the country. In theory, a person can access treatment in any part of the country. But in practice, for lakhs of migrant workers like Jyotesh, continuity of treatment is shaped as much by access to medicines as it is by train journeys between villages and work destinations, the informal nature of work, fear of disclosure, crowded housing, changing shifts, interrupted treatment, missed doses, temporary addresses, and constant calculations.
 
Nowhere is that challenge more visible than in the Ganjam-Surat migration corridor, which sees large-scale movement to the city’s textile hubs.

The National AIDS Control Organisation (NACO) identifies interstate migrant workers as “bridge population” for HIV, due to the social and work environment that increases their vulnerability to infection. The term refers to the role migration can play in linking different communities. Studies cited by NACO have found that in high-migration districts like Ganjam, migrant men were up to four times more likely to be living with HIV than non-migrant men in the same districts. 

The Quint tracked migrant workers living with HIV on the Ganjam to Surat corridor to investigate how they live with the constant risk of becoming “lost to follow up.”

BETWEEN THE LOOM AND THE PILL

The sound of the loom never really leaves you in Surat.

A few lanes away from where Jyotesh rents his room, Ranjan*, a textile worker from Ganjam, who has been living with HIV for the past three years, rides his cycle towards the noise after his lunch break on a blazing April afternoon. He stops his cycle in a lane where every building looks like the other. If the sound of the loom sounded like a distant train earlier, now it feels like he is at the railway station.

Three floors up, inside the weaving unit, he starts the 12 machines, one by one. As soon as he is done starting all, the first one shuts again. The process repeats itself for 12 hours, every day. Thread becomes fabric and sweat becomes a hard day’s money.

He is used to it all, now. The noise, the hours, even, to an extent, the heat. What he is not used to is the HIV pill he must take at 9 pm every night, which, he says, makes him sleepy. So for 14 days a month, when his shift changes from day to night, he faces a dilemma: to skip the HIV medicine or to risk the chance of falling asleep at work.

“For 14 days, I take the medicines. For the other 14 days, I don’t,” he says, matter-of-factly. “They make me sleepy and if I fall asleep, I’ll get into trouble. Twice I slept and my seth (boss) yelled at me. I couldn’t even tell him what the medicine was for.”

It is medically recommended to have the medicines every day at the same time — generally after a meal — to ensure that the virus stays suppressed. Repeated interruptions can risk increasing the viral load and weakening immunity. Healthcare workers generally prescribe it for night time after dinner, so that it doesn’t interrupt work day and the minimal side effects can be managed. They encourage patients to discuss the schedules with them before changing the timing on their own, but Ranjan has not had the time to do that yet.

He was asymptomatic when he was diagnosed five years ago along with his wife, during her pregnancy. His family lives in Ganjam; he moves between the two places whenever he can. He has just returned from a few months in Tamil Nadu, where he was trying to work in the fibre industry.

“I did not understand the language or culture there, so I came back here. Surat has so many people from my village now that it has become another Ganjam only,” he says. “But the heat has become so bad these days, the hot air from the machine blows like fire.”

He says he will ask the doctor in the next visit if he can eat his medicines in the morning instead of at night. “I know I should be eating them regularly, but what can I do? I can’t risk it. I’m here to earn.”

INSIDE THE ART CENTRE

For people living with HIV, the ART centre is their lifeline. It’s where they get their medicines every month, consult with doctors and counsellors, monitor their viral load, and, crucially for migrants, get their transfer letters issued to access medicines from another ART centre, whenever they move. 

When The Quint visited one such centre in Surat, the two doctors’ desks were stacked with transfer letters to sign: transfer-ins and transfer-outs.

“We have around 30-40 transfers per centre every month. It’s a bit more in Surat than other cities as there are more migrants here,” said one of the doctors. There are three ART centres in Surat, which means roughly a hundred transfers moving through the city’s system every month. 

Inside the counsellor’s clinic, patient after patient, a similar pattern plays out. Patients place medicine bottles on the table while the counsellor asks how many pills are left. The bottle is either empty or far too full. Both mean the same thing: doses missed. In almost every case The Quint witnessed, the reason was the same: Was in my village. Medicines ran out/could not be had.

“The main problem is adherence,” says Laxmi Parmar, one of the counsellors in the centre, while making notes in her file. 

India’s HIV programme now allows multi-month dispensing for stable patients, meaning medicines can be provided for more than one month at a time. Counsellors routinely ask workers about upcoming travel plans before deciding how much medication to dispense.

“For us, the main difference between migrants and locals is that migrants don’t usually stay in one place,” said the doctor, who did not want to be named. “They keep moving, so for them to continue this life long treatment is more difficult. They require a lot more counselling. If they go back to the village for a long time, they have to be transferred there so they can get medicines from there.”

In the last two months, migrant workers across states in India, including Surat, have moved back to their villages in large numbers due to the ongoing gas crisis in India, driven by the West Asia conflict. Prices for cooking gas have risen sharply and it has hit migrant workers hardest, who very often don’t have documents for residence proof in the cities they work in, and cannot access subsidised supplies.

MIGRATION AS TRADITION

For over a century, migration has shaped life in Odisha’s Ganjam district. 

Migration runs so deep in this coastal district, that people often joke that every household in Ganjam has at least one person working in Surat. Researchers trace the roots of migration in the region to the Na’Anka famine of 1866, which wiped out almost one-third of the state’s population.

It was initially limited to the northern states, like Uttar Pradesh and Jammu & Kashmir, but shifted to West Bengal after Independence due to the language, food, and cultural similarities and conveniences. Majority of Ganjam’s migrants worked in the jute mills here, and some in coal mines in present-day Jharkhand. Since they could not go to Southern states due to the language barriers, they began going to Mumbai and the industrial areas of Gujarat. Mumbai’s labour politics made the city less accessible and Surat became the destination.

Over time, farmers became textile workers, and it became a skill that was inherited by generations. 

“Migration first became a livelihood for survival and then tradition for the people of Odisha and the rural infrastructure completely changed because of it,”said Lokanath Mishra, co-founder of Association for Rural Upliftment and National Allegiance (ARUNA) NGO, which was started in Odisha in the 1990s to prevent HIV transmission among migrant populations.

“There are trains that are filled with migrant workers everyday, mostly to work in the textile industry,” he said.

Ganjam features among the 17 districts with the highest male out-migration across state borders in India, according to the Working Group on Migration report, published by the then Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation in 2017. While there is no official data available, experts and field workers estimate that there are at least fifteen lakh migrants from Ganjam in Surat, forming a bulk of the labourers for the textile industries.  

The same migration corridor also, over decades, has shaped the district’s HIV epidemic. Ganjam currently ranks eighth among India’s AIDS-prone districts, and has consistently figured in the top ten list.

“In Ganjam, migration is circular. Young boys leave home from the age of 13 or 14. They travel alone, live in crowded rooms, earn cash wages, and stay away from families for long periods. This increases the likelihood of seeking new partners or transactional sex. Services exist across state boundaries. But many migrants only begin treatment after returning home. The asymptomatic period is very dangerous because people feel fine and delay care. The gap between people living with HIV and people currently in treatment is severe. The challenge with the system is that migration is difficult to track. People keep moving.”
Lokhanth Mishra, founder of ARUNA NGO
 
Mishra estimates that of roughly 19,000 people believed to be living with HIV in Ganjam, only around 7,000 are currently under treatment.

A study by the Population Council in 2011, conducted in collaboration with NACO and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), made some relevant findings:

  • In Odisha, 43 percent of all HIV-infected persons in Odisha were from Ganjam alone. 
  • HIV prevalence was four times higher among migrants than non-migrant men, even after controlling for age, education, source of referral and other possible confounding factors. 
  • The likelihood of being HIV-positive for returned migrants compared to non-migrants was over sevenfold.
  • Migrant men were up to eight times more likely to be living with HIV than non-migrant men in Ganjam district.
  • Selected indicators of socioeconomic vulnerability such as literacy, agricultural land/property ownership and employment were associated with HIV infection.

The latest data from Odisha’s National AIDS Control Programme shows that a cumulative 66,121 HIV-positive cases have been identified in the state. 

A senior official from the Odisha State AIDS Control Society told The Quint that the overall HIV caseload in the state had remained relatively stable in recent years.

“Even if the numbers appear high, that is partly because more people are getting tested and diagnosed earlier, instead of remaining undetected for long periods,” the official said, requesting anonymity. “Ganjam remains a priority district because of its long history and scale of out-migration. We conduct awareness and testing activities around festive seasons when many workers return home. There are outreach camps, nukkad nataks (street plays), messages at billboards and behind tickets. But because people keep moving states and change phone numbers, preventing patients from becoming lost to follow up remains a big challenge.”

LOST TO FOLLOW UP

Inside ART centres, NGOs, and healthcare systems, there’s a term routinely used: ‘LTFU’, which stands for Lost to Follow Up. It is used in medical forms and discussions to describe patients who stop returning for treatment.

“Sometimes, migrants say they are going to their villages for two months but if they don’t come back for medicine refills by then, we contact them,” said a doctor at the ART centre. “If we manage to speak with them, we remind them to visit the nearest ART centre. If we can’t get in touch, we contact the NGOs in the village to reach them.”

But a lot of times, ‘LTFU’ happens simply because people living with HIV— migrants or not—have a hard time to accept the diagnosis, or to manage medicines alongside work, or to keep it hidden. Sometimes, especially when asymptomatic, they believe they can simply outlast it without treatment. Outreach workers are tasked with tracing them.

The Quint accompanied Bhadraben, an outreach worker with the Gujarat State Network of People Living with HIV/AIDS (GSNP+), a community organisation supporting people living with HIV, on one such follow-up visit. As we walked through narrow lanes towards a colony where several clients lived, she said to put away the notebook and pen so as not to alert anyone to the nature of the visit.

“Migrants usually stay in crowded colonies. They give an address but it’s not complete or it’s vague. A house has several rooms and several people in one room. We go to find them, and if we can’t get through on the phone, we have to ask neighbours for them by name. People get curious and ask why we are looking. We have to lie and say we are from LIC, or a bank, so as to not disclose, because in most cases no one else knows about the diagnosis.”
Bhadraben, outreach worker

Some patients, she says, give wrong phone numbers and addresses altogether.

Dr V Sam Prasad, Country Programme Director at AHF-AIDS Healthcare Foundation, acknowledged that one of the biggest challenges in HIV care among migrant populations is retention.

“The first challenge is that we tend to lose people after identifying them,” he says. “People are not keen on getting treatment in unfamiliar cities. The current system requires manually getting a transfer letter to access medicines in another city. That needs to change. Even if someone has no art centre in the vicinity, if they want to access meds, local medical stores should be able to get it. The behavioural change will be immediate.”

STIGMA, DISCLOSURE, AND WHAT CITIES OFFER

Ever since he was diagnosed less than six months ago, Ashok* has been consumed with anxieties and fears. What if someone finds out in my village? What if someone finds out here? Will my condition get better? What vegetables can I eat? What if the one ASHA didi who knows tells someone? Will my child eventually get it too? Will my life ever be the same?

The anxieties of the diagnosis sit visibly on him, along with exhaustion of the night shift. 

“Only my wife, me, and the ASHA didi know. Parents don’t keep well and don’t want to worry them more. I used to feel weak and uneasy but since I have started taking medicines it’s better. I just can’t stop overthinking,” he says, speaking softly so as to not be overheard in the temple compound where we sit.

He started his treatment in Ganjam and is now in Surat for two months, where he has worked as a textile worker for the last 10 years. 

“The centre closest to my village is 50 kilometres away in Bharampur. I go by bus or bike but it takes almost the whole day  to get medicines. There is also always a huge line. I prefer it here, the centre is a fifteen-minute walk from my house,” he says, turning his bicycle keys over in his hands.

The calculations that he has just begun to make have been Pooja’s* reality for over a decade, accompanied by something else: guilt. 

A migrant from Odisha, she found out she was HIV positive during her second pregnancy, tested at a government hospital in Surat. She had been married once before when she was very young; she suspects her first husband had the virus though she never knew for certain and he died soon after. Her second husband was diagnosed alongside her, followed by her daughter and son.

 “My son does not know what medicine I gave him every night. He keeps asking, and I keep deflecting. I tell him it’s for strength.”
Pooja
Her daughter, she says, used to blame her for it and ask her why she hadn’t killed her rather than giving her this. Her husband initially blamed her too. For about twelve years, she balanced HIV treatment, an abusive household, and work – sticking diamond stones onto sarees.

“If I didn’t find time to finish it in the day, I would complete it at night,” she says. 

Her worst fears came true in 2019 when her then-landlord found out about her diagnosis and kicked them out of the house. According to her, the information was given to him by someone from the medical community who had treated her. Her husband was severely ill with TB at the time and could not be moved back to Ganjam easily. They rented a one-bedroom apartment for fifteen days, till he got a bit better, and returned to Ganjam for a few months after that.

“I usually go once every few months to collect medicines for my full family. Our vitals are good so they give for a few months,” she says. “It’s so much better to do that here rather than in Ganjam. Even though the hospital is far away and I go secretly, people come to know. They wonder, Kiski bahu hai? Kiske liye dawai le rahi hai? (Whose daughter-in-law is she? Who is she taking these medicines for?) So I don’t go to get medicines when I’m there, I have to make sure I come back before my medicines get over. No one knows where you’re coming from and where you’re going, here.” 

BEYOND MEDICINES

“HIV is complex and when you add migration to it, it’s another challenge,” says Daxa Patel, co-founder and Project Director of GSNP+.

Patel says that one of the initial challenges is disclosure, especially when the partner is staying away. Government guidelines mandate  that once you are diagnosed, your partner should be tested too. 

“We try to get the testing done when they go back to their villages but it doesn’t always happen as they often don’t disclose it to their families. If they are unmarried, then even index 2 testing should happen, which means all their sexual partners, which is yet another challenge,” she says. 

According to her, conversations around condoms or safe sex can themselves trigger suspicion inside marriages where the diagnosis has not been disclosed.

“Along with medicines, nutrition, mental health, housing conditions, and healthcare all affect treatment. Even family support is of utmost importance. In Surat, migrants often stay in rooms which are shared between a large number of people who alternate sleeping in the room as per their shifts. Immunity is already compromised. Crowded living increases chances of airborne infections and co-morbidities.”
Daxa Patel, co-founder and Project Director of GSNP+
 
NACO continues to list migrant workers as a bridge population who are vulnerable to HIV and require Targeted Interventions (TI) for HIV prevention and care. Jogendra Upadhyay, at the Gujarat AIDS awareness and Prevention (GAP) unit, has held HIV awareness sessions and testing drives and camps in Gujarat in collaboration with NACO and International Labour Organisation.

Between 2021 and 2025, they ran testing camps across 48 workplaces in eight districts of Gujarat, reaching 48,000 workers. 138 people were found positive. 

“93 percent of whom were being tested for HIV for the first time in their lives. What’s interesting is that over 90 percent of them were asymptomatic. After their test results, we link them to the nearest government centre,” he tells The Quint. “It’s such a big, unorganised sector that reaching everyone is difficult.”

LEARNING TO LIVE WITH IT

Some of the Ganjam migrants who arrived decades ago have figured out how to live, and work, with HIV in a different city; the alarm clock on their phone is their best friend.

Akka has been in Surat for 40 years and has watched it transform from a small town to an industrial hub. She is part of the transgender community, that NACO recognises as high risk, and among roughly a thousand hijras from Ganjam now living in Surat.

“I used to take medicines from a private practice for the first 6-7 years after diagnosis, before switching to the government. For a few years, I used to keep going back to Odisha to collect my medicines every two-three years before I finally transferred to Surat.”

She is different from most of the people who spoke to The Quint in one significant way. “I don’t hide that I have HIV,” she says. “I tell people. Why should I lie?”

The virus has worn Shivsagar* down differently. He has lived and worked with it for twenty years, but now he can only do the former. He came to Surat three decades ago to work in textile factories and now runs a small food stall near his house. 

“I could lift 100 kilos earlier and now I struggle with 20. I don’t have too much strength anymore and my legs give me trouble. I think I will return back to my village soon” he says, sitting in his one-room apartment with his wife Laxmi, whose yellow saree matches the bandhani cloth hanging in the room.

Through the walls, you can hear the loom from the mill next door. They have lived here for fifteen years, yet, nobody knows about their positive status. During the lockdown, he was stranded in his village without medicines and documents. Now, he carries stock whenever he goes.

But he wishes he didn’t have to.

“I heard injections are coming now instead of daily tablets,” he says, speaking of Lenacapavir, the world’s first twice-yearly HIV injection that has recently launched and has sparked questions and hope among many living with HIV. “When will that happen? Will I be allowed to take it? I’m tired of carrying medicines and documents everywhere.”

*All names of people living with HIV have been changed to protect privacy.

(This content received support from the Thomson Reuters Foundation as part of its global programme aiming to strengthen free, fair and informed societies. Any financial assistance or support provided to the journalist has no editorial influence. The content of this article belongs solely to the author and is not endorsed by or associated with the Thomson Reuters Foundation, Thomson Reuters, Reuters, nor any other affiliates)

 

Russia: Foreigners to undergo medical examination within 30 days of entering Russia.

The Council of Federation approved the law on mandatory medical examination of migrants

Translated with Deepl. Scroll down for original article in Russian

On 3 June 2026, the Federation Council approved a law requiring foreign nationals to undergo a medical examination within 30 days of their arrival in the Russian Federation.

The procedure includes testing for HIV, infectious diseases posing a danger to others, and the use of psychoactive substances without a doctor’s prescription.

The costs of the examinations are to be borne by the foreign nationals themselves or by their employers. The examinations will be carried out only by authorised medical organisations, the list of which will be approved by regional governors. Medical institutions are prohibited from delegating their powers to conduct examinations and issue reports to third parties.

The results of the examinations will be recorded electronically and sent to the federal register within 24 hours. The data will be automatically forwarded to the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Rospotrebnadzor via the inter-agency cooperation system.

A similar procedure for notifying the authorities will apply if dangerous diseases or evidence of drug use are detected during the provision of any other medical care.

The law will come into force on 1 September 2026.


3 июня 2026 года Совет Федерации утвердил закон, который обязывает иностранных граждан проходить медосвидетельствование в течение 30 суток со дня прибытия в РФ.

Процедура включает проверку на ВИЧ-инфекцию, инфекционные заболевания, представляющие опасность для окружающих, а также на употребление психоактивных веществ без назначения врача.

Расходы на проведение осмотров ложатся на самих иностранцев либо на их работодателей. Обследования будут проводить только уполномоченные медицинские организации, перечень которых утвердят главы регионов. При этом медучреждениям запрещено передавать свои полномочия по проведению осмотров и оформлению заключений третьим лицам.

Результаты обследований будут формироваться в электронном виде и в течение 24 часов направляться в федеральный реестр. Данные автоматически передадут в МВД и Роспотребнадзор через систему межведомственного взаимодействия.

Аналогичный порядок информирования ведомств будет действовать, если опасные заболевания или факты употребления наркотиков выявят при оказании любой другой медпомощи.

Закон вступит в силу с 1 сентября 2026 года.

Europe’s HIV response cannot succeed without migrant health equity

Europe debates migration, but ignores migrant health

By Tamara Prinsenberg & Daniel Reijer – AHF Europe